Cautiously Pessimistic

I haven't done a lot of googling yet, but I assume the rest of the world is aware that the new Father General is Fr. Adolfo Nicolas, SJ.  I never heard his name in the "murmurings" that reached my house and I don't know a thing about him.

I found the following interview and read it hurriedly, looking for clues. 

I have highlighted words and phrases that registered 5 or higher on my ookyometer in red.  (Note:  my ookyometer, in addition to matters of Truth and Doctrine, reflects my own individual taste in matters that have no great significance to mankind and certainly not to the Jesuits.)  I have highlighted areas wherein the Pope can breathe a sigh of relief in green.  I have highlighted references to God and His greater glory in royal blue.

Fr Adolfo Nicolas SJ: Six hopes for the General Congregation

Can we be realistic?

I can still remember GC34. They are fond, humorous and challenging memories. But we were not realistic.

Just imagine: 220 Jesuits decide to tackle 46 topics, work on them for three months, produce 26 documents and solemnly handle and approve 416 complementary norms. Thus, we were not surprised when crises emerged: crises of content, of management, and of hope. Next year we will be close to 230 members.

It is my ardent hope that we be realistic as to what a GC can do decently well, what it cannot, and what it should leave to the new Father-General and his team.

Can we be transparent?

Transparency has become more difficult in our small world. When was the last time that a great leader could confess substantial sins in public and continue leading the flock, the country, the Church?

And yet, our GCs have always started with an honest and frank acknowledgment of where we are going wrong, what is missing in our lives, what has been distorted or wounded of our spirit, what needs conversion, renewal or radical reform.

It is my sincere hope that we can do that again. 

Can we be accompanied?

The best of a General Congregation is the event itself, as an ‘event of the heart'. This is a time of intensive search and of exhilarating exchange, where questions and answers do not come lineally, but dance within us and around us, at the rhythm of fraternal and humble mutual openness.

My hope is that this happens to the whole Society of Jesus. I hope that we all take an active part in preparing the Congregation from inside our common issues. Prayer, reflection and exchange are the gift and the contribution.

I hope that those who do not go to Rome, will monitor and follow events closely, with the same hope, the same intensity of search, the same willingness to change and be led by the Spirit of our Lord. This will be our best accompaniment.

Can we be creative?

I have a feeling, still imprecise and difficult to define, that there is something important in our religious life that needs attention and is not getting it. We have certainly been diligent in addressing our problems whenever we have seen them: Poverty (GC32 in 1974 and 34 in 1995), Chastity (GC34), Community (Provincials at Loyola)... But the uneasiness in the Society and in the Church has not disappeared.

The question for us is: Is it enough that we are happy with our life and are improving our service and ministry? Isn't there also an important factor in the perception of people (Vox Populi) that should drive us to some deeper reflection on religious life today? How come we elicit so much admiration and so little following?

Thus, one of my hopes is that in GC35 we begin a process of dynamic and open reflection on our religious life that might begin a process of re-creation of the Society for our times, not only in the quality of our services, but also and mostly in the quality of our personal and community witness to the Church and the World.

Can we be practical?

The age in which we live and our younger Jesuits will live, is an age of very rapid change. New technologies and new communication possibilities can make a great difference. We are using some. We do not feel free to use others. Maybe a certain restraint in using new means might be good for us. Maybe not. It is so difficult to know what is going to happen seven, ten years from now.

It is my hope that the coming GC opens the way for future General Congregations, giving the new General and his Council the freedom to discern and choose the best means to prepare and to run the Congregations of the future.

Can we be short?

We would not like GC35 to become another exercise in patience. A General Congregation is not a "Panacea" for all the problems we might face. It is a help of great value, but basically oriented to the ongoing growth in the Spirit and the Apostolate of the whole Society.

Thus, my final hope is that we will be so clear as to the purposes, and so focused in our work, that we can do this service to the Society and the Church within a reasonably short time.

**********End of Interview*********

What's wrong with the red stuff, you ask?  Nothing major.  But remember that book "Real Men Don't Eat Quiche?" They don't use the word "wounded" either, unless they have just been shot in the leg.

And, for example, the reference to GC34... Most of us remember something decidedly not humorous about that event.  I'm sure he's referring to his own experiences with his brothers, and not to things that had greater implications for mankind.  ("Excuse me, Admiral Nelson, I've got a question... in the back, in the red shirt... use your other eye.")

Stuff like that.

And overall... I can't help asking:  WWID?

With the world in its present state and the Society in its present state, would those have been the top five on St. Ignatius' list of hopes for GC35?

On the other hand, Rocco's post  made me feel a little better.  For the most part, I liked the article about Fr. Nicolas' work in Asia.  (I'm sure St. Francis Xavier is smiling down on that.)  I like the fact that he's a Spaniard -- but then, so was Pedro Arrupe. 

But my ookyometer went off the chart when I reached this paragraph:

The question is how to give the Ignatian experience to a Buddhist’, he says. ‘Not maybe formulated in Christian terms, which is what Ignatius asked, but to go to the core of the experience. What happens to a person that goes through a number of exercises that really turn a person inside-out. This is still for us a big challenge.’ 

Translation:  "St. Ignatius was a man of his time."

You all know how much I love that one.

Asia is hugely important, and will certainly only become moreso in the coming years.  So to elect someone whose attention is focused there is smart.  However, as the Pope has tried hard to point out in the last two weeks, the Jesuits have got to start looking past this planet.  St. Francis Xavier went to Asia by way of Rome.  It is noted in the article that Rocco posted that unlike most of the other potential candidates, Fr. Nicolas has not spent much time there.

Now would be a good time to start.

The candles on my altar will continue to burn as Fr. Nicolas leads the Jesuits in addressing the Pope's concerns.  I hope his strong feelings about transparency will allow us a peek into that conversation.

My prayers are now and will always be for the Society and its future.  It would have been wonderful this morning to have awakened to the Jesuit version of Benedict XVI, but God knows what He is doing, and St. Ignatius is not asleep at the wheel.  Fr. Nicolas seems to be very gung-ho about the Jesuits' future, and I keep telling myself (and anyone else who will listen) that as long as the older Jesuits can be stopped from flying the plane into the ground, it is the young guys who will be their salvation. 

AMDG.

Comments

[Domenico Bettinelli]

A little off-topic, but when I say the post's title, "Cautiously Pessimistic", I first wondered whether you were referring to the AMPTP offer to the WGA or to the election of the new Father-General. :)

[Jim]

Nary a word about preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

[Meg]

So, um, no green or blue?

St. Ignatius, pray for us all.